How much of a jerk am I?

[JiF]Timmay! · Post by **[JiF]Timmay!** » Thu May 03, 2007 3:13 am

Well, I just got back from seeing SpiderMan 3. At IMax. Two days before it opens.

Yep.

[JiF]rIot · Post by **[JiF]rIot** » Thu May 03, 2007 3:19 am

jerk.

[JiF][AARP]Tissueman · Thu May 03, 2007 12:18 pm

At least you're not bragging about it. Hey! Wait a minute! I think you ARE bragging.

So was it any good?

[JiF][AARP]Grimp · Post by **[JiF][AARP]Grimp** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:22 pm

JERK

[JiF]rIot · Post by **[JiF]rIot** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:28 pm

[JiF]Lonewolf · Post by **[JiF]Lonewolf** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:49 pm

I think we are going to try and go see it tonight and if not then it will be Saturday night.

[JiF]Stepovich · Post by **[JiF]Stepovich** » Thu May 03, 2007 2:50 pm

You'll only earn the "Jerk" status if you continue to keep us in the dark about how it was!!

TELL US!

[JiF]Mike · Post by **[JiF]Mike** » Thu May 03, 2007 3:29 pm

No don't!!! I don't want my opinion tainted! A simply, yes it's worth seeing is all I want.

[JiF][AARP]Grimp · Post by **[JiF][AARP]Grimp** » Thu May 03, 2007 3:36 pm

Ya, Timmay! hates "Signs" and nobody in the world but me liked "The Hulk".

[JiF]Mike · Post by **[JiF]Mike** » Thu May 03, 2007 3:45 pm

[JiF][AARP]Grimp wrote:Ynobody in the world but me liked "The Hulk".

lol, I liked The Hulk and often feel the same way. Did you see they are "remaking the remake"? Although they say they aren't, it sure sounds like it. They are making this one much truer to the comic. Edward Norton is playing the lead role and I'm not so sure he's the right guy. I really like him as an actor, he's done some great stuff and will make a great scientist type, just not sure he's right for this role. Guess only time will tell though.

[JiF]Timmay! · Post by **[JiF]Timmay!** » Thu May 03, 2007 4:14 pm

[JiF][AARP]Tissueman wrote:At least you're not bragging about it. Hey! Wait a minute! I think you ARE bragging.

Nope - I'm taunting. Subtle but important difference.

[JiF][AARP]Tissueman wrote:So was it any good?

Yep! Especially on that big honkin' IMax screen. I think I like the 1st one best but this latest one was well worth the price of admission.

Oh.. Wait.. Did I mention it was free? Let me change that to "it'll be worth what mortal people have to pay for admission."

[JiF]Thos · Post by **[JiF]Thos** » Thu May 03, 2007 4:37 pm

I thought IMAX was limited to 120 minutes...due to the physical size of the film. Have they found a way around this? Because the theatrical release of Spiderman is 140 minutes. So I submit that Timmay! has not really seen the movie, just an extra long trailer.

[JiF]Timmay! · Post by **[JiF]Timmay!** » Thu May 03, 2007 4:39 pm

Didn't know that but it seems to be 150 minutes..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imax

[JiF][AARP]Grimp wrote:Ya, Timmay! hates "Signs"

If it wasn't so stupid, I wouldn't have hated it. Uberadvanced aliens come all the way here to a planet covered mostly with water, to eat people who are mostly made of water. Also, water kills them deadand you can catch them by locking them in a closet. Oh, and they use crop circles to communcate among themselves.

[JiF]Thos · Post by **[JiF]Thos** » Thu May 03, 2007 4:47 pm

Because of a technical limitation on the size of the film reel, these early DMR releases were edited to conform to a two-hour length limitation. Later releases did not have this limitation. Current IMAX platters allow a run length of up to 150 minutes.

Good to know! I was avoiding IMAX because of the earlier limitations.

[JiF]AlbieDamned · Post by **[JiF]AlbieDamned** » Thu May 03, 2007 5:02 pm

[JiF]Thos wrote:
Because of a technical limitation on the size of the film reel, these early DMR releases were edited to conform to a two-hour length limitation. Later releases did not have this limitation. Current IMAX platters allow a run length of up to 150 minutes.
Good to know! I was avoiding IMAX because of the earlier limitations.

So all you'll film all your future movies in IMAX now?